I’ve always been an archaeology buff. I figure thats as far away as I can get from my day job. So upon hearing about the Baghdad museum being looted, I was a bit worried. I wanted to visit there someday once they were freed, and it would be great to actually see things there. So hearing that almost everything is still there, well, that made me happy.
Two different articles I have read lately about this. One is in the latest issue of Archaeology magazine that I received last night. And the other one was a article on National Review’s website.
Archaeology devoted several pages to the looting, or not, and the horrors of it all. They go into talking about a dozen or so museums in various third world countries that have been sacked and looted once the anarchy set in around them. Tragic stuff, made me feel bad, etc. They talk about how horrible it is that so many items have been sold into private hands.
National Review’s John Derbyshire talks about an alternative viewpoint that made my eyes open. Relics are better off in private hands. They’re protected better by individual owners than the state in most cases. After a while the owners will loan them off to museums for tours in safe, civilized areas may view the items. They can be studied. And not destroyed by the latest political winds.
As a matter of fact, we may reasonably hope that the West is precisely where the artifacts looted from the Iraqi National Museum will end up sooner or later. The Times quotes Mohsen Hassan, a deputy curator of the museum, as saying that many of the looters were middle-class people who knew exactly what they were looking for. My guess is that there were some museum employees among them. No doubt Baghdad has a few people who would like to have a Sumerian vase on their mantelshelf just to look at. What the city undoubtedly has many more of, though, are well-educated people who are utterly penniless. These people know that even priceless†objects do, in point of fact, have prices — that private collectors in other countries will pay large sums of money for them. Then, 20 or 40 years in the future, when those collectors pass on and their irresponsible heirs sell off their estates, those objects will find their way to institutions here in the West.
Everything from antiquity being in private hands may be a stretch, however. As in everything, the answer is most likely in the middle. Digs can be done by public or private groups. They catalog everything that they find. From there the items can go to public or private galleries, but the catalogs should be made public. If an educational group wants to study something in private hands, the owners should allow the study to be made in almost all cases. Private collectors usually wish to show off their items, so most relics will go on public museum tours. But the items will still be safe. The underground market of antiquities will mostly evaporate. National claims to items can be resolved easily, by paying the asking price for the item. Anything stolen out of a country would be processed under normal laws. In places where anarchy rules currently, hopefully in 10-20 years a stable government will form, and they may then attempt to purchase back items. In cases such as this, it is a good thing that many items won’t be returned. For when they return back to not having a government a few years later, less items will be lost forever.