The mind of Cindy Sheehan

in the early morning on Friday, the 19th of August 2005 by Chad

Lets see if I got this straight…
Military son: Bad
Military son dead: Good
Other son telling her she’s wrong: Bad
Other relatives telling her she’s wrong: Bad
Ailing Mom: Worth the time
Husband who is divorcing her: Not worth the time
Michael Moore: Good
Making part of the idiot public think she’s “Just a mom who wants a few minutes with the President”: Good
Part of the idiot public who sees her for the partisan hack she is: Bad

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading ...

View Technorati blog reactions.

Try and try again.

Scream with me… Sheehan as Speaker of the House??

Slow news month

Bwah ha hah

2 Responses to “The mind of Cindy Sheehan”

William Leatherwood Says:
August 22nd, 2005 at 4:22 pm +0
I notice the ‚¬Å“sheehanites‚¬Â love to repeat Cindy Sheehan‚¬â„¢s redundant and what they consider to be ‚¬Å“revelational‚¬Â question , ‚¬Å“What noble cause did Casey Sheehan die for?‚¬Â Now I guess we have to return back to the elementary class of Saddam 101 to answer that question.

1. Saddam Hussein was a threat to peace in the Middle East. His aggression was only held in check by constant monitoring and economic sanctions that he then used as an excuse to starve and brutalize the people of his own country , all the while, building himself more and more elaborate and gaudy palaces. Was it ‚¬Å“Noble‚¬Â and should have Saddam been removed from power? Ask the Kurds, the Shiites, the Kuwaitis, the Saudis, the Iranians, and the marsh Arabs. I think they‚¬â„¢d all say yes.

2. Saddam brutally tortured and killed hundreds of thousands maybe even millions of innocent people. In my opinion, that alone was sufficient for getting rid of him. ‚¬Å“Nobly sufficient‚¬Â

3. Saddam Hussein supported terrorism in the Middle East and around the world. It has been well-documented that Saddam Hussein paid $25,000 to families of Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel . Just eliminating that incentive to kill innocent Israeli woman and children is ‚¬Å“noble‚¬Â reason alone to remove Saddam. I know Cindy Sheehan is cringing about that one.

4. Terror groups associated with Al Qaeda were operating within Iraq in terrorist training camps such as Salman Pak before the war, and had been funded, at least in part, by the Iraqi government. There is no direct link, other then sheltering the terrorist, between Saddam Hussein and the attacks of September 11, 2001, but there is no doubt that Saddam was part of the larger problem of terrorism.

5. Saddam Hussein disregarded numerous United Nations resolutions, 17 in all, dealing with disarmament and inspections. His military fired anti-aircraft weapons at U.S. and U.K. aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones on a daily bases, so he never lived up even to the initial cease-fire agreement that ended hostilities at the end of the first Gulf War, let alone any of other numerous resolutions by the U.N. Security Council. Any one of those violations would provide legal justification for the war.

6. The ‚¬Å“domino effect‚¬Â theory for moving the Middle East towards democracy and away from terrorism has a good chance of working, and yes that alone is a NOBLE reason to be in Iraq. Witness Libya‚¬â„¢s recent renouncement of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. Iraq itself is moving inexorably toward democratic self-rule, despite the efforts of terrorists and ‚¬Å“dead-enders‚¬Â and the ‚¬Å“anti-war defeatest at home‚¬Â to sabotage the process. If our government stays the course, we will win in Iraq and that victory is for all Iraqi‚¬â„¢s.

7. Removing Saddam Hussein, in my view, was a major part of the larger strategy for the Middle East to move the entire region away from Islamic fundamentalism, theocracy and brutal dictatorship, which give rise to terrorism, and towards representative governments, ruled by law and respectful of individual rights, which will bring peace and stability to the whole region. Yes that is a NOBLE reason and cause to be in Iraq. The insurgents want to keep the blood flowing long enough to distract from that goal, and also so in America dissent will rise against the war in Iraq resulting in a withdrawal.
spencer fox Says:
May 14th, 2007 at 2:00 pm +0
Cindy Sheehan has no mind she only has a dead son