And I realize that this is something that someone has been working at for quite awhile. Looking at my 70’s dictionary, marriage is defined as between one man and one woman. Looking at dictionary of today – “between two people”. Someone has decided to change the basic definition of the word. Someone with an agenda.

But back to the case at hand. A group in the United States has gotten and published a list of donors regarding Prop 8. They are now using fear and intimidation to force US citizens to “change their vote”. When is this ever OK? When did mob rule take affect?

Look at the abortion protesters and these protesters. Courts have ruled against the abortion protesters. They have to be a certain distance away, they have to stay away from client/patients, etc. Yet, these rabid protester are allowed to run rampant. They are allowed to bust into church services and protest in the service, they are allowed to pull the church’s fire alarms, they are allowed to scream at the kids in the church, they are allowed to block customers from access to businesses, they are allowed to “force” people to give up their jobs….

Since when did the gay marriage people join the UAW? (sorry, that is probably a bad joke, but I’m sleepy)

“If you choose to live an ‘alternative lifestlye’, why then are you not willing to create for yourself an ‘alternative marriage’ but insist on hijacking an established tradition?

or is that just too logical?

people have the right to be who and what they are as long as it does not harm others..

the protest would make anyone think she killed one of them.. not that she donated to something she beleived in.

just ticks me off.. they are not helping their cause by doing that crap!

I do not like this turn of events, however. If she, as a private citizen, donated or voted one way or another, she shouldn’t lose her job or her business over it. I think that it sets a scary precident.

I can see people’s anger if she posted signs all over her business. But, she does have the right to a personal and private opinion.

I wonder who released the list. I think that I know why. They wanted to intimidate people who didn’t agree with their agenda.

This is the same tactic that the unions are about to be granted by Congress. The union wants “open votes”. Then, they will be able to intimidate people who don’t vote for unionization.