ObamAcorn

in the early afternoon on Saturday, the 1st of November 2008 by Gypsy

Well don’t this say all.. vote twice.. derr.. this is an idiotic item.. well it is offered by the Gap.. need we really say more? Or am I an idiot to think I could ONLY vote ONCE? Hey.. lets all vote for McCain twice?? How do we pull those strings?

So they have part of the campaign literally promoting the dishonesty of the Obama campaign.. fascinating.. now again what is with his (brain-dead) followers? Don’t they get it yet???

Funny enough.. it took 10 ARTISTS to design this.. HUH? Wow what a talentless group.. since the RED-WHITE-BLUE .. horizontal tri-color with stars design has been a common, definitely seen before button style for how long?? Either I saw it before, or I am a “talented’” dreamer.. even if this were the first design.. come-on 10 artists?? Wow.. guess they have no future huh?

The Limited Edition Vote Buttons were designed by ten renowned artists, and the “VOTE TWICE!” button was designed by John Waters.

And John Waters.. umm is anyone surprised now? If you do not know who he is.. look it up.. but prepare to gag when you search him.. really!

Michelle Malkin » Voter fraud chic at The Gap; Update: Gap’s response

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Sphere] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Email]
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(2 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Related Posts

2 Responses to “ObamAcorn”

  1. Katie Says:

    Part of the “vote early, vote often” mentality.

    Sad to say that our country’s election process is in total shambles. Can any of us actually trust the vote count in the end? Some will complain about suppression and intimidation if one wins. Others will complain about ACORN, dead registrants, voting multiple times, and ballots being signed by patients who are incapable of making an informed vote, if another wins.

  2. Tina Says:

    I have always questioned the validity of the voting process.. it just seems so easy to fudge.. might as well be dropping a token in a box..

    I still think it should be based on fingerprints.. and it scans the system daily for duplicates and tosses out the duplicate vote!

    this would surely curb alot of the current voter fraud, and identity theft issues!

    This would be paperless.. yes requiringpeople to actualy go into vote and not mail in crap.. they would touch the choice which would take the fingerprint.. so the print would be on each selection.. but not difficult the person just has to touch a screen..

    the screen would need to be wiped down between.. but still i think this wouldbe the most reliable version.. and say the fingerprint is unverifiable the person would be contacted..

    no doubt there would be quirks and issues.. but humm nothingnew there.. but this couldbe tested on the local elections first, which would get people used to the system.. and the buggs could be eliminated early on.

    i just think the current patchwork system is a nightmmare, unreliable, can’t be trusted, too much roomm for fraud and other illegal issues!

Leave a Reply

I’m a blonde pollock born on April Fool’s Day. Might as well be a drunk too.

-- Jeff

Recent Posts

    Poll

    Are people dumber now than before?
    View Results

Search

Captain's Logs

The Sites

Syndication

Stats

  • Comments: 6943
  • Pingbacks: 49
  • Trackbacks: 172