Edwards hurt by his affair! Yeah!

just before lunchtime on Saturday, the 9th of August 2008 by Tina

Edwards Downfall due to his affair… YEAH! And yet his wife still supports him. Wow that is one heck of a woman.

He is not expected to go to the Denver Democratic Convention.. so who cares anyhow!?

I am thankful that at least he has been hurt some politically.. I hope it sticks!

It was a rapid career ascent for John Edwards. Then it all came crashing down when the North Carolina Democrat on Friday admitted that he had an extramarital affair, though he denied fathering a daughter with the woman.

AP News : Gazette.com

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading ...

View Technorati blog reactions.

Edwards Admits He Lied!

Easy Answer part II

John Edwards "Little Problem"

Castro Street in Mourning

5 Responses to “Edwards hurt by his affair! Yeah!”

Katie Says:
August 10th, 2008 at 7:13 am +0
Unlike Clinton, Edwards picked a winner of a mistress. Not only, did she not save the dress, but she is not allowing a DNA test on the child. Wow, someone’s money has been well spent.
Tina Says:
August 10th, 2008 at 12:16 pm +0
what does she have to lose by holdingback on the dna… aside from people thinking she is hiding something, and well heck she knew he was married, and had kids.. so obviously she does not care about reputation… so really she has nothing to lose..

if she is lying she still is still getting paid..

if she was being honest she would go ahead with the dna tests.
Katie Says:
August 11th, 2008 at 5:28 am +0
I don’t get women. First - why do these wives stay?

Next - she had to know that she was married. She had to know that he had kids and a sick wife.

Third - (yes, lumping Edwards in the women category - look at his hair) do we really want a man in charge of the “button” who cannot even control his zipper?

She has nothing to lose by denying the DNA. Edwards will continue to pay her the hush money. Since she is obviously a tramp, it doesn’t bother her that she is accused of sleeping with two married men around the same time. And, if Edwards stops paying her, she can get a DNA test anytime in the future.

I do think that her kid has the right to know who her daddy is.
Katie Says:
August 11th, 2008 at 11:26 am +0
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,401324,00.html

One of my favorite clips (remember, this is the mistress talking about the wife who is dying of cancer):

“I’ve only met her once,” Hunter told Newsweek reporter Jonathan Darman in late 2006 during a lunch in which she mistakenly cast him as a friend. “She does not give off good energy. She didn’t make eye contact with me.”

Doesn’t make eye contact with her? Darn, she’s lucky that Elizabeth didn’t kill her (maybe the chemo drip cord would make an excellent choking device). Since when does the whore mistress think that the wife should be “pleasant” to the homewrecker?

But this is another good clip

“Darman, who first met Hunter in Iowa in July 2006 while she was filming the documentary series for the Web, said the woman described Edwards as an old soul who had barely tapped into his potential, but had the power to be a “transformational leader” on par with Mahatmas Gandhi and Martin Luther King.”

Clearly, the woman is certifiable. Sounds like she should be dressed in white and handing flowers out in airports.
Tina Says:
August 11th, 2008 at 4:59 pm +0
The Mistress is no doubt trash.. and disrespectful trash.. sounds like a perfect match for Edwards, who obviously does not deserve the woman he is married too.. she (the wife) deserves so much more!!