‘No Substitute for Victory’: The Defeat of Islamic Totalitarianism

Our acceptance of pragmatism, the policy of short-range trial and error that rejects principles on principle—and altruism, the morality of self-sacrifice—left no other result possible.

The reason for this failure is that every one of the ideas we used to evaluate our options is wrong. In every case, the opposite of today’s conventional wisdom” is true.

• A strong offense does not create new enemies; it defeats existing foes. Were this not so, we would be fighting German and Japanese suicide bombers today, while North Korea—undefeated by America—would be peaceful, prosperous, and free.
• Poverty is not the root cause” of wars. If it were, poor Mexicans would be attacking America, not begging for jobs at Wal-Mart.
• Democracy is not a route to freedom—not for the Greeks who voted to kill Socrates, nor for the Romans who acclaimed Caesar, nor for the Germans who elected Hitler.
• A culture of slavery and suicide is not equal to a culture of freedom and prosperity—not for those who value life.
• The world is not a flux of contradictions, in which principles do not work. If it were, gravity would not hold, vaccinations would not work, and one would not have a right to one’s life.
• Being moral does not mean sacrificing for others. It means accepting the American principle of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”—and living for one’s own sake.

History is clear: All-out force against fanatical killers is both practical and moral. It led us to our two most important foreign policy successes—the defeats of Germany and Japan in 1945—and to the permanent peace with those nations that we take for granted today. Such a course was practical and moral then, and it is practical and moral now—an affirmation, and a defense, of life and civilization.

And yet, still the left wing simply parrots bumper stickers.

Found via the Flea…

(No Ratings Yet)

 Loading ...

View Technorati blog reactions.

Related Posts